Choosing the Right Respirator for Wildfire Smoke: N95 vs P100 (3M Edition)
Don’t Assume One Mask Fits All
Let’s clear this up right away, wildfire smoke isn’t just dust in the air. It’s a cocktail of ultrafine particulates, burned polymers, oil-based aerosols, and volatile organic compounds that behave differently depending on humidity, temperature, and the substrate they contact. If you're thinking your standard-issue N95s will handle all that across an 8-hour outdoor shift, you’re probably going to have a compliance headache by noon.
Respirators aren’t one-size-fits-all, and the type of filter matters more than most buyers realize. We've seen plants run fine with N95s during routine dust exposure but hit a wall when wildfire smoke pushes PM2.5 through the roof. Suddenly filters are clogging mid-shift, breathing resistance jumps, and workers start pulling masks off out of frustration. That’s when safety and productivity both take a hit.
This article cuts past spec-sheet jargon and gets into how 3M’s N95 and P100 respirators actually perform in wildfire conditions, what failure modes show up in real-world tasks, and where fit, filtration, and filter life either hold up or fall apart. Whether you’re writing the PPE budget or managing a floor crew, knowing which mask type holds up under load is not just a technical detail, it’s an operational decision.
N95 vs P100 – The Technical Breakdown
N95 (3M 8210 or 8511): What It’s Good For
The standard N95 , like the 3M 8210 or the valved 8511 , is built to capture at least 95% of airborne particles down to 0.3 microns. That’s fine for non-oily dust environments, sanding stations, or short-term exposure to light smoke. If your process doesn’t involve oils, solvents, or high ambient heat, and your team’s exposure is intermittent, N95s might be enough.
They’re low-profile, low-resistance, and disposable, meaning minimal cleanup and no tracking of filter change intervals. Operators generally tolerate them well on short shifts. The exhalation valve on the 8511 helps with heat buildup, though keep in mind it doesn’t filter exhaled air, so it’s not always suitable in sterile or controlled environments.
That said, once you start introducing soot, vaporized resins, or persistent airborne particulates, the N95 starts showing its limits. The filter media loads quickly, pressure drop increases, and users start reporting fatigue, or worse, they just take it off halfway through the shift.
Use it when:
- Your airborne contaminants are dry, non-oil particulates
- Short-duration tasks (think <2–3 hours per exposure)
- You're okay with a single-use, toss-at-end-of-day workflow
- You don’t need protection from gases or VOCs
P100 (3M 7093, 2297, or 60921): When You Actually Need It
P100 filters , especially 3M’s 7093 and 2297 models , step things up considerably. These are HEPA-level filters that catch ≥99.97% of airborne particulates, and unlike N95s, they’re rated for oil-based aerosols, which are absolutely present in wildfire smoke. Soot particles, aerosolized oils from vegetation and plastics, and even vapor-phase organics tend to settle into this “gray area” where an N95 just doesn’t cut it.
If you’re dealing with sustained outdoor exposure, manual labor, or processes that generate sweat, heat, and facial movement (e.g., field repairs, pump servicing, lot clearing), the added margin of safety and filter life with a P100 is critical. These filters are used with elastomeric half- or full-face masks, which also provide a tighter and more consistent face seal , especially once operators are moving around, sweating, or wearing hearing protection that could disrupt disposable ear-loop designs.
The 7093 is sealed in a hard case, making it better suited for dirty or spark-prone environments. The 2297 adds a nuisance organic vapor layer, good for when there’s low-level VOC exposure but you’re not at IDLH conditions. The 60921 is the next level: it combines P100 filtration with organic vapor sorbent media, giving you particulate + gas protection in one cartridge.
Use it when:
- You’re exposed to smoke, soot, or vaporized organics
- Heat, sweat, or long shifts make disposables impractical
- Your process includes oil mists, compressed air blowoff, or paint fumes
- You need a reusable, trackable system with integrated fit checks and filter change logs
If your process involves a 20-minute inspection in a mildly smoky area, N95s might work. If your crew is out clearing intakes in a dense plume or you’re inside a facility that pulls in outside air during fire season, you’re going to want P100, no question. Filter efficiency, seal stability, and breathing comfort all scale better when you're using the right platform.
Real-World Use Cases That Prove the Difference
1. High-Speed Packaging Plant – N95 Failure Under Load
Context: Beverage canning plant in Kelowna, BC, operating under high output during the Okanagan wildfire season. Facility runs dual shifts with open-bay loading docks and a semi-automated palletizing line. Workers were issued 3M 8210 N95 respirators as part of a basic wildfire contingency plan.
What went wrong:
Heavy smoke from surrounding fires pushed AQHI readings above 9 (high health risk). Filters clogged within a single shift. Forklift drivers and machine operators reported lightheadedness, elevated heart rates, and complaints about breathing effort. Several removed masks to continue working. Quality control flagged contamination inside shrink-wrapped product zones.
Fix:
Safety coordinator sourced 3M 7502 half-mask elastomeric respirators with 7093 P100 filters, along with pre-filters to extend filter life. Masks were issued to line-critical personnel. Rotation plan: filters changed every two days, masks cleaned nightly. Fit testing was conducted using saccharin aerosol kits onsite.
Why it worked:
- P100 filters resisted soot loading
- Valved masks reduced heat stress inside the plant
- Workers trusted the gear , usage compliance went up
What they learned: N95s might check a regulatory box, but they don’t hold up under sustained smoke exposure in industrial environments.
2. Optical Lens Facility – N95s Allowed Trace Contamination
Context: Precision optics and coatings facility near Gatineau, QC, operating a cleanroom with Class 10,000 (ISO 7) certification. Fire smoke from Northern Ontario drifted into the region, triggering days of poor air quality alerts. Staff used 3M 1860 N95s in gowning and prep areas.
What went wrong:
Despite the building’s filtration system, sensors showed a gradual uptick in submicron particles inside the airlock. Optical glass substrates began showing haze or streaking on the coating layer. Root cause analysis traced the contamination to smoke-laden ambient air and N95 filter inefficiency for ultrafine soot.
Fix:
Technicians were upgraded to 3M 2297 P100 filters with nuisance organic vapour protection, mounted to low-profile 3M 6502 half-mask respirators. Masks were stored in individually labeled clean containers and sanitized daily with isopropyl-safe wipes.
Why it worked:
- Higher efficiency filters caught submicron wildfire particles
- Carbon layer reduced off-gassing odours that interfered with final QC
- Fewer lens reworks and lower contamination rejection rate
What they learned: When optical precision is part of the output, any airborne deviation , even if “technically within spec” , can cost tens of thousands in wasted labour and materials.
3. Utility Field Crew – N95s Weren’t Enough at AQHI 10+
Context: Hydro field technicians working for a provincial utility in northern Alberta, inspecting overhead lines and substations during July wildfires. Crews were equipped with standard issue N95s from mobile PPE kits.
What went wrong:
When smoke from the Fort McMurray region pushed AQHI to 10+, crews experienced severe breathing resistance after 2–3 hours on task. N95s became saturated quickly. Climbing harnesses and face sweating caused poor seal retention. Several crew members removed their masks, leading to internal safety flags and stop-work orders.
Fix:
Supervisors rolled out 3M 7093 P100 filters on 7500 series respirators, bundled with pre-filters and rigid mask storage cases. Filter change intervals were logged on laminated crew cards and tracked per shift.
Why it worked:
- Crews experienced easier breathing, even at full exertion
- P100 filters withstood high soot concentration without clogging
- No further mask removals were reported
What they learned: For sustained outdoor work in wildfire zones, elastomeric P100 systems offer far better protection , and fewer compliance headaches , than throwaway N95s.
The Hidden Fail Points You Need to Plan Around
If you’ve ever rolled out PPE across a site and assumed people would “just wear it properly,” you know how fast that plan can fall apart. Respirators, especially under wildfire smoke conditions, come with some sneaky failure modes , and most don’t show up until you're mid-shift, short-staffed, and already behind schedule. Here’s what trips up most operations, even the well-prepared ones.
1. Filter Clogging Happens Fast , Especially When You’re Moving
Wildfire particulates aren't like clean shop dust. They’re sticky, oily, and ultra-fine , and they load filters much faster than you’d expect. Once that filter media saturates, breathing resistance spikes. The problem? Most workers don’t recognize it’s happening until it feels like they’re breathing through a pillow. By then, performance is compromised.
In high-exertion roles (line work, pump servicing, rooftop inspections), pressure drop matters. N95s don’t give you a clean indicator when they're past their limit. No built-in warning. No audible change. And unless you’ve trained people to feel for it or track wear time, they won’t know the filter’s shot until they physically can’t keep it on.
What to do:
- Use P100s with scheduled filter replacement, not “when it feels bad”
- Consider adding pre-filters to extend service life in soot-heavy air
- If you're not tracking changeout intervals, you’re flying blind
2. Poor Fit = Useless Protection
Doesn’t matter if it’s rated for 95% or 99.97% , if it doesn’t seal, it doesn’t filter. A huge chunk of N95 failures in the field come down to fit. Stock disposable masks don’t work well on everyone. People with narrow chins, rounder cheeks, or even slight stubble break the seal. And unlike elastomeric respirators, you can't tension or adjust the fit much.
We’ve seen facilities run a whole fire season thinking they were covered, only to fail a surprise fit test audit.
What to do:
- Run model-specific fit testing , don’t assume one mask works for all
- Avoid issuing N95s to workers with beards or inconsistent facial dimensions
- If you don’t have a seal-check protocol built into your shift start, build one
3. Skin Irritation and Heat Fatigue Kill Compliance
Non-valved respirators trap heat and humidity fast , especially on longer tasks or when ambient temperatures are already high. Once facial skin gets saturated, masks slip, rub, and start to irritate. Add in dusty conditions or sweat, and you’ve got pressure sores, fogged glasses, and masks being pulled off just to cool down.
It’s not a comfort issue. It’s a safety and productivity issue. Operators who can't tolerate their mask will either wear it improperly or not at all.
What to do:
- Issue valved respirators where acceptable (3M 8511, or elastomeric P100s with exhaust valves)
- Train crews to take mid-shift mask breaks in controlled environments
- Consider alternating teams during extreme AQHI conditions to reduce heat fatigue buildup
4. Operator Training Gaps Are Where Most Programs Fall Apart
You can spec the best filter on the market and still have your whole program fail if no one knows how or when to use it. A lot of people believe N95s protect against vapours , they don’t. And many assume one filter lasts all day , again, not in wildfire smoke. If there’s no clear protocol for when to change filters, how to check for seal loss, or what symptoms to watch for, people will guess , and they’ll guess wrong.
We’ve seen crews doing everything right on paper but still getting exposed because no one ever told them the difference between organic vapour protection and particulate filtration.
What to do:
- Build a quick reference card: what mask, what filter, how long it lasts
- Include hands-on training , not just a slide deck
- Create a simple pre-shift respirator checklist (fit, resistance, seal check, exposure time)
No respirator is plug-and-play. Every failure mode above is avoidable, but only if you engineer it into your process , not bolt it on after something goes wrong. If you want real protection, you need real protocols, real training, and gear that’s matched to the actual job conditions , not just the minimum spec.
P100 Respirators Compared , 3M vs Moldex vs Honeywell
When you're picking P100 filters for wildfire smoke or any high-particulate environment, small differences in design can cause big differences in the field. Below is a no-nonsense comparison of three common options used in industrial and utility settings across Canada. This isn’t about brand loyalty , it’s about how each model actually holds up under pressure, sweat, and soot.
Feature |
3M 7093 (P100) |
Moldex 2360 (P100) |
Honeywell 7580P100 |
Efficiency |
99.97% (NIOSH P100) |
99.97% (NIOSH P100) |
99.97% (NIOSH P100) |
Oil Resistance |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Valve |
No |
Yes (Ventex® , reduces exhalation resistance) |
No |
Platform Fit |
3M bayonet (fits 6000, 6500, 7500, FF400) |
Moldex 7000/9000 Series |
North Series (Honeywell half/full face) |
Field Durability |
High (sealed hard shell, resistant to sparks) |
Moderate (soft outer shell, less impact-proof) |
Moderate (open element, requires filter covers) |
Why this matters in real use:
- Filter Shell Strength: The 3M 7093 comes in a rigid case that shrugs off drops, sparks, and mechanical bumps , ideal for shops, utility work, and dusty warehouses. Moldex and Honeywell are fine indoors, but more vulnerable to damage in field conditions unless paired with covers.
- Exhalation Comfort: Moldex gets points for comfort with its Ventex® valve, which lowers breathing effort , especially useful for high-exertion tasks or hot environments. But note: a valve doesn’t help with incoming contaminants, and may not be acceptable in sterile or cleanroom-adjacent spaces.
- Compatibility: If your team is already using 3M facepieces (which most industrial facilities in Canada are), going with 7093 keeps inventory simple and avoids adapter kits. Honeywell and Moldex require dedicated platforms, which means more SKUs, more training, and more chances for someone to grab the wrong part.
- Operational Fit: Want to keep things simple? Stick with one platform across multiple roles. Mixing filter brands with incompatible mask models is a real problem , especially when you’re in a rush, short on supply, or dealing with temporary crews.
If you're working outside or in a high-dust, high-contact environment like a transfer station or substation, 3M 7093s are the safest bet for durability and system compatibility. If comfort is king and your environment is controlled (think packaging lines, labs, or indoor service calls), Moldex 2360s offer lower breathing resistance. Honeywell 7580s work just fine , but only if your team is already set up with North Series facepieces and knows how to maintain them.
When to Use Which – Practical Guidelines
Choosing the right respirator setup isn’t just about what’s available in the supply room. It comes down to exposure time, workload, airborne contaminant type, and whether your crew can actually wear the thing for the full shift without ripping it off halfway through. Here’s a plain-language breakdown of when each filter type makes sense , and when it doesn't.
Use Case |
Recommended Filter |
Light-duty indoor work (< 2 hrs) |
N95 (e.g., 3M 8210) |
Outdoor fieldwork in wildfire smoke |
P100 (e.g., 3M 7093 or 2297) |
Smoke with VOCs or chemical vapours |
P100 + Organic Vapour cartridge (3M 60921) |
High-exertion or extended shifts |
Elastomeric P100 with exhalation valve (7500 series) |
Light-Duty Indoor Work (< 2 hrs)
Use: Short inspections, forklift operation, indoor transfer zones.
Why: You’re not in it long enough to clog the filter, and heat buildup isn’t a huge issue. N95s (like the 3M 8210) are cheap, easy to wear, and fine when your AQHI is in the moderate range and your crew is mostly stationary.
Watch out for: If you’re near open bay doors or high foot traffic areas, particulates can drift in , consider stepping up to P100 if air handling isn’t great.
Outdoor Fieldwork in Wildfire Smoke
Use: Site servicing, pole inspections, air intake clearing, lot maintenance.
Why: Once you’re outside for more than an hour , especially at AQHI 7 or above , N95s start loading fast. You need oil-resistant filtration and better seal integrity. P100s like the 7093 or 2297 hold up better, and pairing them with elastomeric masks gives you a reusable, sealed setup that won’t break down from sweat or soot.
Watch out for: These setups require daily wipe-downs and filter tracking. If that process isn’t already baked into your workflow, build it in.
Smoke with VOCs or Chemical Vapours
Use: Near vehicle exhaust zones, fuel handling, combustion testing, or where fire-damaged materials might off-gas.
Why: N95 and even basic P100 filters won’t stop vapours like benzene, formaldehyde, or toluene. You’ll need a combo cartridge , typically P100 paired with an organic vapour sorbent layer like the 3M 60921. These are designed to trap both particulates and low-level gases.
Watch out for: Sorbent capacity is limited. Once saturated, they let vapours through. You’ll need to track hours of exposure and replace cartridges on a schedule , not when they “look dirty.”
High-Exertion or Extended Shifts
Use: Maintenance tasks, rooftop systems, extended mobile crew work.
Why: If your team is sweating, climbing, or doing manual tasks for 4+ hours, comfort and breathing resistance become major factors. Elastomeric respirators with P100 filters and exhalation valves (like the 3M 7502 with 7093 filters) offer the best balance of protection, comfort, and longevity.
Watch out for: These masks are heavier and require proper cleaning after each shift. Store them in rigid containers , not tossed into a glovebox , or you’ll lose seal performance and contaminate the interior.
Bottom line: Match the respirator to the actual work conditions , not just the budget line or what the distributor has in stock. Your best-case scenario is consistent protection with minimal fuss. Your worst-case is non-compliance or downtime because the wrong mask made the job harder than it had to be.
What Happens When It Goes Wrong
Case Study: Systemic N95 Failure in a Bottling Plant
Context:
Mid-season wildfire smoke rolled into the Fraser Valley and settled over a beverage bottling facility running two 10-hour shifts. The company issued standard 3M 8210 N95s across all departments, including packaging, warehousing, and shipping. Air intake from loading bays was pulling in unfiltered smoke directly onto the floor, driving indoor PM2.5 readings over 300 µg/m³.
What went wrong:
By Day 2, line workers started reporting fatigue, shortness of breath, and headaches. Forklift drivers were seen pulling masks down to breathe more easily. N95s were clogging fast , often before a full shift was completed. Pressure drop made breathing effort unsustainable, especially during manual tasks like tray packing and pallet shrink-wrapping.
Most of the crew didn’t recognize the signs of filter failure. Supervisors noticed increased water breaks, productivity dips, and masks worn around necks or tucked under chins , a clear compliance problem and a serious safety risk.
Failure mode:
- Filter saturation: N95s clogged with soot and oily particulate by mid-shift.
- Seal breakdown: Sweat and motion led to poor contact on the face , especially on non-valved models.
- User removal: Once resistance spiked, masks came off. Compliance dropped below 50% in the most active zones.
How it was fixed:
EHS rolled out 3M 7502 elastomeric half-face respirators paired with 7093 P100 filters. Pre-filters (5N11) were added to slow down main filter loading. A filter changeout schedule was introduced , every 2 days for high-exposure roles, tracked with dry-erase tags on each unit. A 15-minute pre-shift training covered donning, seal checks, and filter replacement protocols. Cleaning kits were distributed, and masks were stored in rigid containers between uses.
What they learned:
Paper specs don’t mean a thing if the mask gets pulled off halfway through a shift. Even a properly rated N95 is no match for sustained exposure to wildfire smoke in high-output environments. What saved the plant from escalating safety issues wasn’t just a better filter , it was putting a system in place that matched the real-world conditions: longer shifts, hotter temps, more exertion, and filters that load faster than anyone expected.
Takeaway:
If your filter can’t survive the full work window, it’s not the right solution. Field performance matters more than spec-sheet numbers , especially when your operators are sweating through shrink wrap or sorting pallets in an unfiltered warehouse at AQHI 9.
Final Takeaways for Buyers and Safety Teams
If wildfire smoke is in the forecast and your crew is out there moving, climbing, or running shifts longer than a few hours, don’t kid yourself, P100 filters are a necessity, not a luxury. N95s are great for dry dust, quick tasks, or controlled indoor spaces, but once you factor in smoke, oils, and sweaty, high-exertion conditions, they’re going to clog faster than you expect.
Don’t rely on your workers to intuitively know when a filter is done, most won't notice until breathing resistance spikes significantly. Track filter usage on a clear schedule (e.g., filter changeout every second shift under heavy conditions), and make that tracking obvious, tags, logs, or whiteboards. The more visible and structured the schedule, the fewer compliance headaches you'll have.
Also, never assume your people know how a mask fits just because it’s on their face. Fit testing is not optional. You can have the best filter on the market, but if the seal leaks, you might as well not bother. Perform model-specific fit testing annually or whenever you switch respirator models. Seal is everything, no exceptions.
Finally, the smartest move for simplifying your safety program is to standardize your respirator platforms across your whole facility. Choosing one compatible system (like 3M’s bayonet-style) reduces your inventory complexity, streamlines training, and cuts down confusion in the field. If your maintenance teams and warehouse crews share the same cartridge system, that means fewer SKUs to manage, fewer opportunities for mistakes, and quicker onboarding when wildfire season hits again next year.
Get Your Respirator Program Fire-Season Ready
If you haven’t revisited your wildfire smoke protocols since last season, now’s the time. Start by pulling up your exposure control plan and checking whether it actually reflects how your site operates during high AQHI days. That means looking beyond what’s technically compliant and asking whether your crew can keep their respirators on for a full shift without pulling them off halfway through due to heat, breathing resistance, or discomfort.
Evaluate your current respirator inventory. Do you have the right filter type for wildfire conditions (P100, not just N95)? Are your mask platforms consistent across departments, or are you juggling three different cartridge systems with incompatible fittings? And are the masks actually usable in real-world conditions, meaning they don’t slip when someone’s sweating, and the breathing effort doesn’t spike after four hours?
Then, check your training. Make sure operators are getting hands-on practice with:
- Positive and negative pressure seal checks
- Filter change intervals based on use time and air quality, not guesswork
- Storage protocols that keep elastomeric masks clean, dry, and undamaged between shifts
These aren’t just compliance items, they’re what keep your operation running when the air outside turns brown and your staff is working through it. Get ahead of it before the smoke settles in.
About the Author

Alexander Goodfellow is a technical product specialist and industrial safety consultant with eGrimesDirect, a certified 3M distributor. With over a decade spent working directly with plant managers, utility supervisors, construction leads, and emergency response coordinators, he focuses on one thing: making sure respiratory protection actually works under real-world conditions, not just in spec sheets.
His background includes field assessments for wildfire crews, confined space entry protocols, gas monitoring strategies, and PPE selection for mixed-exposure environments (particulates + vapours). He’s been called in after failed site audits, last-minute cartridge substitutions, and full-crew fit test flops, and helped clients get back on track with gear that fits, seals, and lasts.
Alexander is known for cutting through product jargon and giving straight, practical advice on what masks to issue, how often to change filters, and what setup works when the air turns brown and the work still needs to get done.
To learn more or get in touch, visit:
👉 www.goodfellowsolutions.com
Connect on LinkedIn:
👉 Alexander Goodfellow
Find certified respiratory protection and fit-testing tools:
👉 www.egrimesdirect.com
Bibliography
-
3M™ Particulate Respirator 8210, N95 – Technical Data Sheet (PDF)
3M Personal Safety Division. April 2019.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1425070O/3m-particulate-respirator-8210-n95-technical-specifications.pdf -
3M™ Particulate Filter 7093, P100 – Technical Data Sheet (PDF)
3M Personal Safety Division. December 2006.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/149967O/3m-particulate-filter-7093-p100-technical-specifications.pdf -
Cartridge and Filter Selection Guide (Brochure, PDF)
3M Personal Safety Division. December 2012.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/565214O/cartridge-and-filter-guide-brochure-70-0714-8870-7.pdf -
Fit Testing Tight-Fitting PPR-161 Technical Bulletin (PDF)
3M Occupational Health & Environmental Safety Division (OH&ESD). January 2003.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/9461O/fit-testing-tight-fitting-ppr-161-technical-bulletin.pdf -
Guide to the Selection and Use of Particulate Respirators (NIOSH Publication No. 96-101)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC/NIOSH. March 1996.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-101/default.html -
Protect Your Lungs from Wildfire Smoke or Ash (EPA–NIOSH Joint Factsheet, PDF)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. November 2018.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/documents/respiratory_protection-no-niosh-5081.pdf epa.gov -
OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) – Section VIII: Chapter 2, Respiratory Protection
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Accessed July 2025.
https://www.osha.gov/otm/section-8-ppe/chapter-2 -
Wildfire Smoke and Your Health
Health Canada, Government of Canada. Accessed July 2025.
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/wildfire-smoke-health.html -
Respiratory Protection for Wildfire Smoke (Fact Sheet, PDF)
BC Centre for Disease Control. July 2021.
https://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/Health-Environment/BCCDC_WildFire_FactSheet_FaceMasks.pdf -
Wildfire Smoke and Air Quality Health Reference Document
Government of Ontario. June 2024.
https://www.ontario.ca/page/wildfire-smoke-and-air-quality-health-reference-document -
Non-fit Tested Respirators for Wildfire Smoke Protection in Community Settings (PDF)
Public Health Ontario. June 2024.
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/W/24/wildfire-respirators-smoke-protect-community-setting.pdf -
Exposure to Smoke from Wildfires – Technical Brief
Moldex. Accessed July 2025.
https://www.moldex.com/resources/technical-briefs/wildfires/ -
Wildfire Air Quality Strategy
City of Toronto. 2024.
https://www.toronto.ca/community-people/health-wellness-care/health-programs-advice/air-quality/wildfire-air-quality-strategy/ -
How Do You Select the Right Respirator?
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). Accessed July 2025.
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/ppe/respslct.html -
Wildfires in Canada: Toolkit for Public Health Authorities (PDF)
Public Health Agency of Canada. July 2024.
https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/services/publications/healthy-living/wildfires-canada-toolkit-public-health-authorities/wildfires-canada-toolkit-public-health-authorities-en.pdf -
Help Protect Yourself from Wildfire Smoke (3M Canada Resource)
3M Canada. Accessed July 2025.
https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/worker-health-safety-us/safety-resources-training-news/health-safety-hazards/respiratory-protection-wildfire-smoke-cleanup/
Leave a comment